The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
another reason why many people are cautious about taking growth hormone is that it is subject to what's called negative feedback if your blood levels of growth hormone are too high by virtue of injecting growth hormone well then the pituitary can register that and the Brain can register that and then there's a negative feedback that shuts down growth hormone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Yeah, the negative feedback that I spoke about briefly when you have elevated IGF-1 it will give negative feedback and there is an elevation something called somatin which is like a basically tells your body don't make as much GH essentially
there's the grein receptor which super confusingly is also called like the GH receptor I believe it's also so-called and then you have the GHR receptor and the production of GHRH endogenously as well as the agonism of grein receptors can both stimulate growth hormone