The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so um enterobacter um e coli salmonella um klebsiella um i think so these are all kind of the proteobacteria phylum yeah citrobacter shigella um yeah so so ones that we typically think of as you know potential pathogens when they show up on a stool test yeah you know obviously it's always context dependent but um we do see that those tend to be more inflammatory uh in in western populations yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.