The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so all these subjects were metabolically healthy they had no signs of chronic disease weren't taking any regular medications most of them exercised regularly doing fairly intense exercise and half had daily contact with nature
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and half had daily contact with nature so but daily that's it that's significant daily contact i mean how many of us really have daily contact with nature like not a lot yeah i think i'd have to look at what their definition that was it might have been just like walking their dog outside well but that yeah yeah maybe that's that's impactful yeah