The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that's a very young science that's an incredibly young science and you know right now we're writing multiple grants every cycle to get funding to analyze my freezer and analyze the microbiome from the blood specimens and the urine specimens and the poop specimens that we have for all my clinical trials so we can see what are the processes that are changing and the people that don't get well and the processes that are changing and the people that do get well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.