The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
yeah so i've got to believe that being an ancestral human touching animals that you're hunting touching animals that you live with whether it's cows or dogs or you know touching animals that you've killed that's got to affect your microbiome too don't you think
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when I was on the I got a deer with my bow and I'm sure that my microbial diversity changed butchering that deer and eating it having the blood on it of it on my hands and respectfully appreciating that
when you hunt a deer or a buffalo you're going to touch that animal and that's going to expose you to a microbiome on the skin on the fur when you're butchering that animal you're going to get exposed to the microbiome you're trying not to cut into their viscera their stomach or their intestines but you still might so you're definitely going to give yourself some quotes special probiotics when you touch animals and i think that's a that's potentially a big part of it