Andrew Huberman· PhD
We also talked about what constitutes a healthy versus unhealthy microbiome. And it's very clear that having a diverse microbiome is healthier than having a non-diverse microbiome.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
We also talked about what constitutes a healthy versus unhealthy microbiome. And it's very clear that having a diverse microbiome is healthier than having a non-diverse microbiome.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think if you asked any number of world experts, and I certainly ask this of Dr. Sonnenburg, what is a healthy microbiome, they're all going to tell you it's a microbiome that has a lot of diversity, that includes a lot of different types of bacteria.
but we know in the context of the gut, and for people living in the industrialized world, higher diversity is generally better.
the diversity of the gut microbiota is certainly thought be a good thing however you know we have a mutual friend who we know he has a high biodiversity in his gut but all of it is those bad actors that we talked about earlier so you can have in a very diverse set of criminals that you that you have hanging out in your gut so diversity itself doesn't necessarily tell you anything
we know that a diverse microbiome is not in and of itself indicative of a quote healthy microbiome because we can we can have lots of Proteobacteria or other parameters aerobic organisms that can be pathogenic that are that are causing it to look like there's diversity but it's not really a good collection of
and so we generally want or in studies it looks like a higher alpha diversity is generally better typically as we know right you can have a high alpha diversity with a bunch of proteobacteria bunch of bad actors but if you have low proteobacteria or you have low bad actors generally a higher alpha diversity is better right generally yeah