Paul Saladino· MD
depending on the season their microbiome shifted and certain bacteria seemed to almost completely disappear and when they went back to eating the food of the following season
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
depending on the season their microbiome shifted and certain bacteria seemed to almost completely disappear and when they went back to eating the food of the following season
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and those same microbes that oscillated the most in that study between the wet and the dry season for these hunter-gatherers were the same microbes that are lost in today's modern western populations