The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We don't get enough light, we don't get the right kinds of light, we don't get proper sunlight, our circadian rhythms are messed up, we're disconnected from people, we don't see them in person, we're not grounding, we're not in nature.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
sunlight exposure uh grounding being in nature these right angles are called you know Landscapes of Despair by Michael Eastern or others we need fractals and green and color and human connection outside of the digital world