The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people think it's you know nonsense because they show Ridiculous things they show that you know it's you know sperm quality is like in the toilet because of RF emfs and that's something even huberman has talked about and that's almost like fertility clinics tell you to not hold your phone in your pocket and why well you know this is a very electromagnetically sensitive area of our body and you know mitochondria extremely important for for Reproductive health
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.