Andrew Huberman· PhD
If the NFL is using it for a player, you can use it as an athlete, meaning as an athlete at any level, right? And it's that digitization of information that can feed you.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If the NFL is using it for a player, you can use it as an athlete, meaning as an athlete at any level, right? And it's that digitization of information that can feed you.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.