Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
It's a good question. I think it's one of those complicated things where there would probably be some upsides to the sharing. Some people need the like sort of community element like yeah that would probably enhance in some ways. Um, the community element and the competition might also bend people's behavior in a way that maybe they wouldn't have behaved had they not known that they were part of this group. Right? So I think these questions get really complicated and
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.