The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The only way that I have really seen it is if somebody kind of gradually changes their identity. Sometimes it can be rapid like let's say you read a you know let's say that every morning you go down and you make some toast and jam for breakfast. Um and then uh you read a book that convinces you that carbs are the devil and grains are terrible and you're like oh I don't want that at all now.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.