Paul Saladino· MD
Non-flickering full spectrum visible light (vs blue enriched, flicker indoors)
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Non-flickering full spectrum visible light (vs blue enriched, flicker indoors)
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But it's just interesting like this is what humans are used to. This light that doesn't mess up your circadian rhythm, full spectrum light with ultraviolet and infrared, and it's not flickering. and the absolute absence of EMF. I think we forget that for the majority of our evolution as humans, there was absolutely no radio frequency EMF that we were exposed to. That's non-native EMF. And that's what's out here in the wilderness. And that's why I think one of the reasons it feels so freaking good to be here.