The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in a sense the cost of your good habits is in the present the cost of your bad habits is in the future and that misalignment between when you feel rewarded and when you feel punished — helps to explain why we tend to fall pretty easily into a lot of things that we would categorize as bad
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what you find is that for most bad habits the immediate outcome is actually pretty favorable... It's only two or five or ten years later that the ultimate outcome is negative with the good habits especially the first time you perform them it's often the reverse... and it's only two or five or ten years later that you get the outcome that you're looking for