Andrew Huberman· PhD
And so [gasps] the group of us that are shuffling around, some of them are saying this is an issue on the same level as asbestos. This is a public health issue and it's big.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so [gasps] the group of us that are shuffling around, some of them are saying this is an issue on the same level as asbestos. This is a public health issue and it's big.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.