The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And very different is, you know, individuals with PCOS, polycystic ovarian cancer, is there's ongoing work, some really good work out of Norway looking specifically at HIIT in individuals with that condition, showing some real benefits there.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
On the sex-based differences, you know, writ large, are there sex-based differences in some outcomes? Yes, I think they're subtle. At least the evidence to this point would suggest there are some differences, they're probably subtle differences, but we do need to know a lot more.