Peter Attia· MD
my guess is after they they've been able to do it for you know once a week for a while you build them up to two times per week
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
my guess is after they they've been able to do it for you know once a week for a while you build them up to two times per week
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
say somebody's doing five Training sessions per week but they're doing you know one to 5 hours total maybe two of those sessions can be high intensity versus B1 I don't see an issue with that again I think everybody should based on your training history and your experience you know you don't want to burn out or risk injury but if your volume is low I think you can afford to fit a little bit more high intensity training in there
if you're doing 1 to four maybe hours per week you should be less concerned with how oh I'm spending 80% of my training time doing zone two you could probably do a little bit more high intensity and in fact you might need to do more high intensity based on things like citations from Dr Ben LaVine on studies where if you want to get the same benefits of doing 8 to 10 hours of moderate intensity you need to do the 1 to four hours need to be a higher intensity to equate basically your your training volume
I mean you you know and I were talking when creating this guide and you talk about how you know you might do three high-intensity sessions per week but they're only and I say only but 10 minutes long