Andrew Huberman· PhD
You've got to get up there. Close.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
You've got to get up there. Close.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I also think the the goal of the interval style training if you're doing it without like, you know, in a lab is that you'll still see benefits even if you're not necessarily hitting that 90%, it might just take a little bit longer.
you'll still see benefits even if you're not necessarily hitting that 90%. It might just take a little bit longer
I also think the the goal of the interval style training if you're doing it without like you know in a lab is that you'll still see benefits even if you're not necessarily hitting that 90%.