Paul Saladino· MD
the hodgson hunter gathers and they found that women living in villages consuming a mostly agricultural diet exhibited more caries and periodontal disease than those living in the bush consuming a mostly wild food diet
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the hodgson hunter gathers and they found that women living in villages consuming a mostly agricultural diet exhibited more caries and periodontal disease than those living in the bush consuming a mostly wild food diet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
within hadza hunter-gatherer communities tubers were a fallback food clearly indicated by them to be that way that honey was favored that honey doesn't cause cavities
men living in the bush consuming a mostly wildfood diet had more cavities than those living in the village consuming a mostly agricultural diet and that was interesting but what they said here is that the unexpected discovery of high carries incidents in men in the bush is likely explained by they hypothesize a heavy reliance on honey which i disagree with and perhaps differential access to tobacco and marijuana