The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of the reasons that we don't is cost so it's rarely covered by insurance and HCG a month of that is in the hundreds of dollars so let's say like $300 to $500 but a month of sort of therapeutic FSH is probably $2 to $3,000 so that cost is really limiting
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Is there any reason to do that over the Clomid approach or is it just that it's faster? I think you might gain a couple of weeks of time. Okay. So, for most people, that's not price worth with that taper over a month or two.
So, is there any reason to do that over the Clomid approach or is it just that it's faster? I think you might gain a couple of weeks of time.
Well, that's a way more cost effective approach than giving syn because synthetic FSH is pricey. Yes. Couple thousand a month. Yeah. In America.