The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you gave an oxytocin antagonist meaning you would give into the brain something that blocked the oxytocin receptors so if the oxytocin is being released into the BL brain but you have a pharmacological agent blocking its ability to bind to its receptors these sheep and goats wouldn't um bond to their baby for instance
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.