The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And the same thing is true for the areas we've described that control mating behavior. This is what Lindsay is working on, you can stimulate those areas 'til you're blue in the face, and the mouse just sort of wanders around, but if you put another mouse in, wham, he will try to mount that mouse, if you put a kumquat in the cage. [Andrew laughing] He'll try to mount the kumquat, and so it becomes a sort of any port in the storm.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you activate these neurons and you give them an object, they will try and mount with it as long as it looks like a mouse. So if you give it a toy mouse, the males will try and mount the toy mouse.
If you activate these neurons and you give them an object, they will try and mount with it as long as it looks like a mouse. So if you give it a toy mouse, the males will try and mount the toy mouse.