The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
but it's the FSH specifically that encourages sperm production so why wouldn't um a man who's taking maybe testosterone therapy or who perhaps just wants increased sperm caltin quality take FSH instead of human chonic G atropin which is more or less a proxy for luteinizing hormone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
why is that the case given that HCG is acting on the ladig cell you would think you would need recombinant FSH to get the protection of sperm Genesis right because it has some FSH properties if you give a man for fertility just HCG y you actually see improvements in spermatogenesis