Peter Attia· MD
the bottom line for the trial in a secondary analysis pre-specified was that there were no more prostate cancers diagnosed in men on T replacement versus on Placebo
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the bottom line for the trial in a secondary analysis pre-specified was that there were no more prostate cancers diagnosed in men on T replacement versus on Placebo
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so what what the study tells us is is it's reassuring in many many ways number one men with low PSAs have a low risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer number two you can use PSA in generally similar Fashions when you're supplementing a man uh on um supplement on exogenous testosterone that is you can look at changes in the PSA