The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so they're like operating in a state of Androgen deficiency perpetually and relying on this synthetic progestin to drive all like testosterone like Behavior essentially and then if they get off they don't even know what their natural is like they've never experienced it because they've been prescribed it since you know 15 years old or 16 years old or something
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and in addition to that too like you said with the not knowing where you were at further confounding that is how many people have been on combin oral contraceptives for like decades AB yeah just totally skews everything yeah like I've dated girls who I've seen like 80% suppression of their hormone levels like testosterone free testosterone especially proportionally more so too because of the rise ofg goes through the yeah it's ruthless