The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what we found in this study is that women who don't qualify as a gestational diabetic still have significantly increased adverse outcomes as their plasma glucose levels go up and so what we're talking about is big fat babies large for gestational age babies and babies with extremely high levels of c-peptide in their umbilical cord which is which is essentially insulin and this is a problem
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.