Paul Saladino· MD
Dear @bryan_johnson (part 3 of 🥩), You seem like a nice fellow, but I (and others) find it hard to believe that your testosterone level of 947 ng/dl does not include some sort of "androgen enhancement."
Loading…
Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
Dear @bryan_johnson (part 3 of 🥩), You seem like a nice fellow, but I (and others) find it hard to believe that your testosterone level of 947 ng/dl does not include some sort of "androgen enhancement."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I and others find it a bit hard to believe that your testosterone levels are ~940ng/dl without "androgen enhancement" after you needed supplemental testosterone on a 2000 calorie diet.