We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
The egg quality data from nicotine comes from cigarette smoking. So, I think it's a little bit more nuanced because smoking directly, if we want to look at that, you know, I always say it's one of the few things that gets into the vault and decreases our egg count. And I say chronic inflammation can get in there, but you know, nicotine, cigarette smoking definitely does. You go into menopause early, you'll get fewer eggs. The egg quality is detrimental.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.