Bryan Johnson· Author
We chose GHRH agonism over exogenous GH because it preserves natural pulsatility.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
We chose GHRH agonism over exogenous GH because it preserves natural pulsatility.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's the Gin receptor which Super confusingly is also called like the GH receptor I believe it's also called and then you have the ghr receptor and the production of ghr endogenously as well as the agonism of gin receptors can both stimulate growth hormone