The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it turns out that she probably was lower than that because once you get her there her acne is out of control yeah right and so that you you would surmise from that that well she must have lived at a lower level and for her 80 is super physiologic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now you say look we're going to set a target of 80 to 100 nanograms per deciliter which is sort of in the ballpark of what would you know what would be kind of 70th to 80th percentile for women that age but then it turns out that she probably was lower than that because once you get her there her acne is out of control