The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
my preference would be to do dried urine I like to use saliva for cortisol I like to use dried urine so that I get metabolomics in addition to the levels of these hormones and if I'm forced to I'll use blood testing and that's certainly the gold standard for all of these hormones that we're talking about but um it's not as comprehensive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think it's actually pretty reasonable to do just saram levels of hormones there are multiple hormone panels out there like a Dutch which is a dried urine hormone panel I don't think you need to do this unless you're looking at very specific issues and as I mentioned on a previous podcast with Tommy wood urine testing is not good for androgens that is testosterone and related androgenic hormones so if you interested in androgens you need to get serum levels urine can be okay for other hormones but to really complete the picture I think you can just get serum or moans to start