The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
They make testosterone but their body can't make use of the testosterone because they don't have the receptors. And the receptors are vitally important for some, for most all of the secondary sexual characteristics that we talked about. Body hair, penis growth during puberty et cetera.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Well what's happening is the testes are making testosterone, but the receptor for testosterone is mutated.