The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I wish that the medical profession um could agree on nomenclature that included hormone replacement, the R replacement therapy for people that are out of range, you know, that are too too low, out of the normal reference range. Hormone augmentation therapy. um for people that want to push within the normal range.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it would be great if both women and men could augment their hormones to be at the high end of normal or wherever puts them in a place where they're not experiencing symptoms.