The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I'll tell a woman today, we're going to start you on this when you're going through menopause. We're using bio-identical hormones. And if your upper bound risk of breast cancer is one case in a thousand, you should at least weigh that against all of the other benefits, which I'll talk about.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I'll tell a woman today we're going to start you on this when you're going through menopause we're using bioidentical hormones and if you're upper bound risk of breast cancer is one one case in a thousand you should at least weigh that against all of the other benefits which I'll talk about now