We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
dramatically reduces one's endogenous testosterone production and dramatically reduces one's sperm count and maybe even quality we'll maybe talk about this a little bit later but maybe even can there there's I've been told that it can perhaps introduce a DNA fragmentation uh within the remaining viable sperm as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Constant use is not constant use for longevity or whatever is not a good idea for fertility. So that's going to be much more suppressive.