The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And there's also the change in testosterone levels, which may have something to do with why these cells proliferate. And that happens where that's actually been shown in men like very consistently 20 30% reduction in testosterone after having kids probably because evolutionarily that's a time when you're supposed to start taking care of kids and stop looking for another mate.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
That seems to be not a lower testosterone man strategy, but it does seem that we we know that when the kid is young, if the guy is physically involved with the uh a small dependent offspring that there will be suppression in testosterone and that is a good thing.
And that's why animals have mating seasons etc. >> Sorry. >> It would make us go out and look for other mates when we don't need to. >> You're aggressing and fighting for status and singing or flexing your muscles or ignoring your kids or being an [ __ ] to your wife. I mean, all of these um you're also not uh reinforcing adaptive behaviors with a bit of a testosterone spike. Like if you're around a attractive woman and you're trying to seduce her, there there's very possibly going to be a testosterone increase which stimulates a dopamine surge and reinforces a behavior if you're successful.