The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
However, if you're willing to sustain a period of being without a given hormone, some people can do things and then stop taking them, and then wait out the period in which they're not making testosterone, estrogen or growth hormone, and then it will come back, sometimes and sometimes it won't.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So a decision to go that route of taking something is often not always a decision to do it forever. However, if you're willing to sustain a period of being without a given hormone, some people can do things and then stop taking them, and then wait out the period in which they're not making testosterone, estrogen or growth hormone, and then it will come back, sometimes and sometimes it won't.