The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
My previous efforts to rejuvenate my thymus: https://t.co/tXfyDXzB3A [@bryan_johnson: Preliminary thymus 3T MRI results. Did I rejuvenate my thymus with HGH therapy? Data shows that we successfully rejuvenated my thymus by ~7 years. However, we are not convinced of the outcome because we didn't have sufficient baseline reads for statistical significance. The therapy goal was to rejuvenate my thymus with HGH by lowering fat fraction and increasing total water volume.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Sadly, 2 of the scans were unusable for analysis (learning curve).
However, we are not convinced of the outcome because we didn't have sufficient baseline reads for statistical significance.
The therapy goal was to rejuvenate my thymus with HGH by lowering fat fraction and increasing total water volume.
Sadly, 2 of the scans were unusable for analysis (learning curve).
We will continue to measure to evaluate statistically significant changes.
Data shows that we successfully rejuvenated my thymus by ~7 years.
Therefore, no causality from HGH can be implied from this as the baseline data is from 2 scans only.
Did I rejuvenate my thymus with HGH therapy?