The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Is it possible to look at receptor distributions in adult humans using some imaging technique so that um or do you have to biopsy fat and muscle from the midsection to get a sense of like estrogen receptor density and saturation? the biopsy would be the way to go. And a unfortunately fat biopsy is even more uncomfortable than a muscle biopsy.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.