The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
a GD is forever anogenital distance is forever now what that means is it's not like your anogenital distance today is what it was when you were born of course you're a bigger person but that means adjusted for body size right so if you assume that AGD is forever if you're born with a short for your size AG then when you're 20 you'll have a short for your size AGD okay
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
anal distance is actually dimorphic so it tends to be 50 to 100% longer in males than females that makes sense if you think about what's going in that space there's a lot of real estate in in males between the anus and you know let's say the penis penal insertion much more than in females so it's natur that that will be longer
So, anogenital distance is a marker that's been talked about by Shanna Swan, and Joe Rogan's mentioned this. It's as males are developing to differentiate from females, we want to have a longer anogenital distance. And if that shrinks, we see some feminization of males, feminization of male genitalia.