The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now, the whole idea of synchronization of menstrual cycles is pretty controversial, for a long time, people said, "Oh, this is absolutely a well-characterized phenomenon," people in dormitories, their menstrual cycles would synchronize, people living in environments together, their menstrual cycles would synchronize, and then some studies came out that kind of undercut those data and said no, this actually doesn't happen, and it was kind of controversial
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.