The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And all other aspects of what you would call sexual development. Now this is something that's gotten a lot of popular press and it has to do with how exposure to androgens in particular while we were in utero, impacted whether or not people report as homosexual, heterosexual, identify as male or female.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And this was looking at oto acoustic emissions. [...] And he reports that that the compared to straight women, the lesbians have fewer of these oto acoustic emissions than straight women. It's like, well, what what how would that happen? Um, how I I couldn't think of any way to explain that except that, well, well, the lesbians might have been exposed to more prenatal testosterone than straight women before birth. And I don't know how to explain that except to say, well, maybe prenatal testosterone, maybe if you're exposed to that before birth, you're more likely to be attracted to women when you grow up.