Paul Saladino· MD
if they use a cotton sling the man don't have any problems with their spermatogenesis or their male hormones but when they do a polyester sling and this also happens in dogs you do see negative changes
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if they use a cotton sling the man don't have any problems with their spermatogenesis or their male hormones but when they do a polyester sling and this also happens in dogs you do see negative changes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
wearing a polyester sling around your balls decreased sperm counts and affected male hormones negatively over the course of I think it was a few months that the study went on