Andrew Huberman· PhD
So in puberty, testosterone leads to further growth and development of the penis, as well as the accumulation of or growth of pubic hair, a deepening of the voice, all the secondary sexual characteristics, okay?
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So in puberty, testosterone leads to further growth and development of the penis, as well as the accumulation of or growth of pubic hair, a deepening of the voice, all the secondary sexual characteristics, okay?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So the point here is that dihydrotestosterone not testosterone is responsible for this primary growth of the penis. And that testosterone later is involved in the secondary sexual characteristics deepening in the voice, et cetera.
the point here is that dihydrotestosterone not testosterone is responsible for this primary growth of the penis
So what you're basically saying is that the growth of the penis is largely determined by DHT, right? Early on. Yes. pre-pubertal and then after puberty it's controlled by testosterone testosterone sufficient to drive penal development. Yeah,