The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
with aging DHEA declines but cortisol production does not so the chorus with the DHE ratio actually naturally if you consider Asian natural naturally increases you're one another explanation of why we become catabolic with age and we don't basically uh you know respond that well to protein
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
with Asian DHEA declines but cortisol production does not so the chorus of the DHEA ratio actually naturally if you consider Asian natural naturally increases you're one another explanation of why we become catabolic with age and we don't basically uh you know respond that well to protein
We are producing similar amounts of cortisone and DHEA. These are the two hormones that basically once you reach puberty cortisone and DHEA are produced at at a, you know very high amount. And with aging, DHEA declines, but cortisol production does not. So the cortisol to DHEA ratio actually naturally if you consider aging natural naturally increases.