The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one of the other conditions that seemed to be important again was to have relatively low blood glucose so probably not eating too close to exercise or not ingesting a lot of sugars during the exercise that was supported by the fact that ingestion of a sport drink that contains caloric sugar immediately flatlined the growth hormone levels so really interesting relationship between insulin glucose and growth hormone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.