The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this is just keeping it in the normal range it's not we're not doing like uh testosterone above the normal range which is basically not healthy it's just keeping in the normal range to reduce that biological age of free testosterone index to from 70 to around in the 40s or 30s as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yes I do part of blueprint is I'm on a 20 caloric restriction diet along with caloric restriction is you get lower testosterone levels by supplement testosterone to bring my levels back up to normal range
one of these markers is free testosterone index over the past couple years as we've optimized for caloric restriction we've reduced my biological age by 20 years on that marker