Andrew Huberman· PhD
They either had elevated levels of testosterone to begin with, so their ceiling was higher, so bringing it down didn't have that much of effect, or that they have very low levels of aromatase in their system.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
They either had elevated levels of testosterone to begin with, so their ceiling was higher, so bringing it down didn't have that much of effect, or that they have very low levels of aromatase in their system.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there aren't a lot of conclusive studies about the effects of cannabis on testosterone or estrogen or aromatization in any direction
will'll smoke cannabis and experience gynecomastia or in females so males and females both have breast tissue but in males it's typically um uh it's not hypertrophied um but they'll smoke cannabis and get a um gomia growth of the male breast tissue
this seems to be something that Ur purportedly occurs on a backdrop of elevated androgens meaning in puberty or a backdrop of some other um form of Androgen incre like someone who's on steroid
I feel like if that was the case it would be very known in the scientific Community as something that comes out