The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I have my um this is my Fitbit. This is my Apple Watch. And then I happen to have a company that called Sensomics that has two different this is a new one they have out um um and then the older one. And so they all measure heart rate, heart rate variability and reasonably accurate meaning, you know, not that far off.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.