The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
that said I think that um you know recovery scores and things like that are just notoriously poor at predicting performance and I think there's a reason that serious athletes would never use things like that um they would tend to rely on the more tried and true methods of predicting Behavior such as heart rate uh maybe heart rate variability but morning resting heart rate probably more predictive than anything else
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they would tend to rely on the more tried and true methods of predicting Behavior such as heart rate uh maybe heart rate variability but morning resting heart rate probably more predictive than anything else